data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/14d56/14d56770f3059b64c39fa783c16fe4afbfda495a" alt="MegaMind MegaMind"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8524c/8524c4e01c97ee695fd0681c23d1a25aecf0b13d" alt="Megamind Movie Megamind Movie"
Such is Arsenal’s inability to hold on to a lead, you would not trust them to walk your dog, let alone win the Premier League. 2-0 down at half-time, Tottenham Hotspur were helpless, hopeless and beaten – against any other side. For 45 minutes a swaggering Arsenal had held a gun to the back of their rivals’ head. Tottenham winced, waiting for the trigger to be pulled to end it all, but it never happened. It rarely does. Like a James Bond villain, they got complacent, bored even, spending too much time telling their victim what they were going to do rather than actually doing it. It was hardly surprising that Tottenham managed to escape their clutches. Arsenal were brilliant in the first half, with Cesc Fábregas and Samir Nasri foolishly granted the freedom to strut their stuff as and when they pleased. At the interval they were heading for the top of the league, which is where they would have stayed all weekend due to Chelsea’s defeat at Birmingham City.
And then they imploded, as they so often do. Already this season they have relinquished leads against Sunderland and Shakhtar Donetsk. Last year they drew 2-2 with West Ham after leading 2-0 with 16 minutes to go, and lost 3-2 to Wigan Athletic after leading 2-0 with 10 minutes left. This is a side that once contrived to draw 4-4 with Tottenham when they were 4-2 up in the 89th minute. It is not surprising, because it keeps on happening.
While there is much to admire about Arsenal’s football, they no longer know how to win and Arsène Wenger is incapable of instilling a maturity in the side. Surely he would have drummed home the importance of retaining their lead for as long as possible; within minutes of the restart, though, Tottenham were back in the game. Arsenal are too open, unable to shut up shop as champions must, lack leadership and concede too many soft goals.
Credit must be given to Harry Redknapp’s brave tactical changes that prompted Tottenham’s revival – his introduction of Jermain Defoe and redeployment of Rafael van der Vaart at half-time were inspired – but this game was all about Arsenal’s fragility in defence. Tottenham’s goals came from a long punt, a foolish handball by Fábregas that conceded a penalty and, finally, a header from a free-kick. All were eminently preventable, yet Arsenal’s creaking back four requires only the slightest push to collapse. The mistakes made by Laurent Koscielny and Sébastien Squillaci were placed into sharper focus by the imperious display by William Gallas for Tottenham. For all his foibles – at one point he appeared to be close to tears – Arsenal could have done with him on Saturday.
Let’s be honest, the headlines were already written for this game. Roberto Mancini has copped a lot of stick in the past few weeks, much of it deserved, for creating a Manchester City side about as forward-thinking as the American Tea Party. With all that money, fans and neutrals alike had a right to expect something a little more progressive than Mancini’s ludicrous take on 4-3-3, which mainly seemed to feature nine players shuffling methodically behind the ball while Carlos Tevez wearily foraged alone up front. Waiting to twist the knife was Mark Hughes, the man Mancini replaced at Eastlands and now manager of Fulham. Hughes spent much of the build-up to the game making a comfy coffin for Mancini and, had Fulham won, he would have walked into the post-match press conference armed with a hammer and nails.
This, of course, is the man who was given a limitless pot of money and spent it on Roque Santa Cruz, so Hughes’s comments should be taken with a pinch of salt. Yet, had he taken revenge on Mancini for nicking his job, that would surely have been it for the Italian. Being beaten by the man they got rid of would have been a humiliation too far for City’s owners to countenance.
This was the sort of game which City’s players could have made exceedingly uncomfortable for Mancini then. Players are not entirely stupid and they would have known the consequences of defeat but rather than fold at Craven Cottage they tore Fulham to shreds. Even though Mancini refused to dispense with his three-man midfield, City were exhilarating going forward and were three up by half-time. Most pleasing for Mancini was the sight of his midfield playing with a gusto rarely seen this season. Gareth Barry laid on the assist for Carlos Tevez’s opener and Yaya Touré scored a fine goal. In the weakest title race in years City are definitely contenders. This may come to be seen as a defining moment for Mancini.
Although West Brom made a big noise when they won 3-2 at Arsenal – leading 3-0 at one point – and drew 2-2 at Manchester United, they have spent the past few weeks silently slithering down the table. Almost unnoticed, Roberto Di Matteo’s halo is starting to look a tad wonky. After beating Fulham on 23 October, West Brom were sixth in the table, two points behind Arsenal in second. Now they are 15th, two points above the relegation zone.
At the time there was genuine talk of a challenge for Europe, while some fans fretted that Di Matteo’s success might lead to him getting a job offer from a bigger club, in the same way that West Ham fans once worried that Chelsea would poach Gianfranco Zola as their manager. How times change. Since those heady days West Brom have lost four of their five games, drawing the other against bottom-placed West Ham. Ominously for them, three of those defeats have come against sides they might have expected to beat: Blackpool, Wigan and Stoke. During this wretched run West Brom have scored three goals and conceded 10.
After impressing initially Peter Odemwingie has stopped scoring and the defence have started to give the impression that the 6-0 defeat by Chelsea in their first game was a truer reflection of their solidity. West Brom need a win sooner rather than later. Promoted sides often survive on a wave of euphoric momentum in their first season back and, once that has gone, it can be difficult to regain. Just ask Hull.
Kevin Davies might not know how to use a toaster but he definitely knows how to take a penalty. The Bolton Wanderers striker spent much of his week asking his Twitter followers how to heat up a pop tart, doing nothing much to alter the perception that footballers are a bit dim. Rather like his career, though, he got there in the end.
Davies is a bizarre player in many aspects, a late bloomer who had a terrific start to his career, an old-fashioned, pointy-elbowed target man who won his first England cap at 33. He is a deceptively sharp finisher, yet has managed to reach double figures only three times in his career. And now we have found out why – he has only just started taking penalties and, somewhat bafflingly, it turns out he is something of a specialist from 12 yards.
Davies first scored a penalty in Bolton’s 4-0 victory over Wigan in March last season. This season he has scored four from four. His first was against Birmingham City in August, a right-footed side-footer that nestled in the side-netting. Essentially unstoppable. He scored a near-identical version against Tottenham two weeks ago. Davies scored two in Bolton’s 5-1 victory over Newcastle United. Both were comfortably placed into the bottom-right corner, Tim Krul sent the wrong way for the first. Before his second Newcastle’s players even told Krul which way to dive – and Davies still beat him, rolling the ball in precisely the same spot and tantalisingly out of the goalkeeper’s reach. Davies is living proof that it is never too late to learn.
If Lionel Messi had scored that, we would never hear the end of it. How often is that line trotted out when a lesser-known player comes up with a wonder-strike? The point is that people tend to go all weak at the knees when Messi provides a moment of brilliance because he tends to do it every week for Barcelona. For the likes of Luke Varney, who scored a jaw-droppingly superb volley in Blackpool’s 2-1 win over Wolves, these moments tend to be a strictly once-in-a-lifetime achievement.
Not that it makes it any less special. Indeed, there is something gloriously anarchic about a player such as Varney accepting a routine pass on the left, chesting the ball down and sending an arcing, dipping volley over the head of the disbelieving Marcus Hahnemann from 30 yards out. It was a strike reminiscent of Thierry Henry’s searing volley for Arsenal against Manchester United in 2000 and praise does not come much higher than that. John Pantsil once tried to score an overhead kick in front of the Kop and, if he had pulled it off, there would have been no point in ever watching a game of football again. So heroically, defiantly implausible was Pantsil’s effort, there would have been nothing left to see, nothing left to discover. Here is hoping Blackpool fans do not feel the same way. Their team continue to amaze.
guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010
Published via the Guardian News Feed plugin for WordPress.
Carlo Ancelotti has made the startling admission that he does not consider himself to be in control at Chelsea after effectively seeing his position at the Premier League champions undermined by the surprise dismissal of his assistant first-team coach Ray Wilkins.
The Italian was described by a close ally as being at his “lowest ebb” since swapping Milan for Stamford Bridge 18 months ago and was reported to be considering his position. He is understood to have consulted the League Managers Association over his future.
Chelsea dismissed rumours that Ancelotti had resigned as “absolute nonsense”. The Italian’s remarks about his lack of control at Stamford Bridge follow an unsettling period that has seen the team’s lead at the top of the Premier League cancelled out and Wilkins replaced by the little-known Nigerian Michael Emenalo on the owner Roman Abramovich’s instigation.
Ancelotti had been flanked for the first time by Emenalo in the dug-out at Birmingham City on Saturday as Chelsea succumbed to their third defeat in four league games – they have suffered successive league defeats for the first time since May 2006 – to leave them above Manchester United at the top only on goal difference. Yet Ancelotti said he is competing from a much weaker position than Sir Alex Ferguson at Old Trafford, with the hiring and firing of his staff, and the club’s transfer policy, out of his hands.
“You have to compare me with [Sir Alex] Ferguson, it’s a different position,” said Ancelotti in the wake of the 1-0 loss at St Andrew’s. “It is different because Ferguson has total control of the team. I am just [providing] technical direction. Full stop. OK.” Asked whether Wilkins’s shock dismissal 11 days ago was still having an effect on the side, he added: “This is not the reason why we lost. We lost the games because in four games we scored just one goal. We have to improve there, to stay more in focus. We have to continue to play like we did against Birmingham.”
Although it remains unlikely that Ancelotti would tender his resignation at present, particularly given the fact he has experienced similar constraints while working under Silvio Berlusconi at Milan, the past two weeks have exposed an unnerving fragility in the hierarchy at Stamford Bridge. The manager had been supportive of Wilkins, who has suggested he will explore possible legal action against the club over what he considers to have been his “undoubtedly unfair dismissal”, but was powerless to prevent his departure and had little say in the choice of the new assistant first-team coach. The episode, so untimely given Chelsea’s smooth ascent to the Premier League’s summit, has left him uncomfortable.
It was Avram Grant’s imposed appointment as director of football in 2007 which clearly heralded the beginning of the end for José Mourinho.
Emenalo, who is continuing his role as chief opposition scout, has yet to complete the necessary coaching qualifications and is not involved in the first team’s training sessions. The Nigerian has no direct experience of coaching a top side, though it remains to be seen whether Ancelotti’s assertion last Friday that the assistant’s duties would not change even after he has acquired his necessary badges proves valid. “He’s doing the same job as Ray Wilkins,” said Ancelotti when asked what Emenalo contributed during games.
The Italian, who remains adamant that his side will bounce back from their recent mini slump, has yet to open negotiations on a new contract at Stamford Bridge, where his deal has 18 months to run. When asked about his future earlier this month, Ancelotti had been comfortable to begin talks at the end of the campaign. “I don’t know what will happen, but I have a contract with Chelsea until 2012 and I want to respect this,” he had said. “It’s not the time now. I hope to stay. I don’t have a problem to sign a new contract but this won’t be my last job. Above all I would like to have experience with a national team.”
Rumours circulated on the internet last night that Ancelotti, so dismayed by recent events, had tendered his resignation, though Chelsea were dismissive of their validity. The manager is due to give a pre-match press conference on Monday ahead of the visit of Zilina to Stamford Bridge in the Champions League on Tuesday, with the Italian hoping to use the match as the springboard to a recovery.
guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010
Published via the Guardian News Feed plugin for WordPress.
The blog owner requires users to be logged in to be able to vote for this post.
Alternatively, if you do not have an account yet you can create one here.