What is SONY doing to protect Playstation Users after being Hacked

sony
Six days after a security breach of its PlayStation Network, Sony said Tuesday that the incursion was much worse than expected and hackers had obtained personal information on 70 million subscribers.
The company, in a blog entry posted Tuesday afternoon, added it is still unsure if the intruder also obtained credit card data for members who have that on file with the service, which provides online functionality for the PlayStation 3.
“Although we are still investigating the details of this incident, we believe that an unauthorized person has obtained the following information that you provided: name, address (city, state, zip), country, email address, birthdate, PlayStation Network/Qriocity password and login, and handle/PSN online ID,” wrote Patrick Seybold, senior director of corporate communications for Sony Computer Entertainment America. “It is also possible that your profile data, including purchase history and billing address … and your PlayStation Network/Qriocity password security answers may have been obtained. … While there is no evidence at this time that credit card data was taken, we cannot rule out the possibility.”
My question now is “what is SONY doing to protect users information?”, in this attack, we’ve learned that emails have been going out to Playstation users with a series of bogus email ids and requesting the Playstation users to add that specific email address to their contact list. However, Anonymous denies responsibility for this incident, saying on its site, “While it could be the case that other Anons have acted by themselves, AnonOps was not related to this incident and does not take responsibility for whatever has happened.”
while PlayStation users get anxious to resume online gaming, they’re eager to understand whether PlayStation could have done something earlier to prevent such an attack.

Posted in Games, News | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

PlayStation Network Down Because of ‘External Intrusion’

PlayStation Network wasn’t hacked by Anonymous, if you believe the group, but it sure appears someone hacked Sony’s service. Sony today finally updated its customers again after two full days of downtime (as of this writing). No information on when the network will be up and running was provided, but Sony confessed that an intruder was indeed the problem.

“An external intrusion on our system has affected our PlayStation Network and Qriocity services. In order to conduct a thorough investigation and to verify the smooth and secure operation of our network services going forward, we turned off PlayStation Network & Qriocity services on the evening of Wednesday, April 20th,” Sony explained on the PlayStation blog.

“Providing quality entertainment services to our customers and partners is our utmost priority. We are doing all we can to resolve this situation quickly, and we once again thank you for your patience. We will continue to update you promptly as we have additional information to share.”

This is a major blow to PS3 gamers who were looking to settle in with Portal 2 and other online titles over this holiday weekend. It was fairly obvious this wasn’t routine maintenance from the beginning, but now the situation is starting to get out of control. If Sony doesn’t want a PR nightmare on its hands, it’s got to figure out a solution quickly.

Posted in Games, News | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Misrata mortar attacks kill at least 15 civilians

The content previously published here has been withdrawn. We apologise for any inconvenience.

Posted in News | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Apple named ‘least green’ tech company

Powered by Guardian.co.ukThis article titled “Apple named ‘least green’ tech company” was written by Felicity Carus in San Francisco, for The Guardian on Thursday 21st April 2011 10.07 UTC

Apple has come bottom of the most comprehensive green league table of technology companies because of its heavy reliance on “dirty data” centres.

The list, which is compiled by Greenpeace and released in San Francisco on Thursday, shows that the company relies heavily on highly polluting coal power at the sites that house its banks of servers.

Greenpeace’s report, How Dirty is Your Data? reveals that the company’s investment in a new North Carolina facility will triple its electricity consumption, equivalent to the electricity demand of 80,000 average US homes. The facility’s power will be supplied by Duke Energy, with a mix of 62% coal and 32% nuclear. On Wednesday, Apple posted a large boost in quarterly earnings, which grew by 95% to bn (£3.65bn).

Gary Cook, Greenpeace’s IT policy analyst and lead author of the report, said: “Consumers want to know that when they upload a video or change their Facebook status that they are not contributing to global warming or future Fukushimas.”

Companies in the US are not required by law to disclose their energy use or carbon emissions. But Greenpeace drew on publicly available information on investments made in data centres, to estimate the maximum power these facilities will consume, and matched that information with data from the government or utilities.

The report estimated dependence on coal for Apple’s data centres at 54.5%, followed by Facebook at 53.2%, IBM at 51.6%, HP at 49.4%, and Twitter at 42.5%. Top marks in Greenpeace’s clean energy index went to Yahoo, followed by Google and Amazon. Greenpeace is also campaigning for Facebook to “unfriend coal” and use cleaner energy to power its servers.

Cook said: “Many companies treat their energy consumption a bit like the Coca-Cola secret formula, because they don’t want competitors knowing how much they spend on energy. The amount of electricity they consume would give some indication of what kind of arms race they were in. They don’t really want this story to be told.”

Cloud computing relies on large data centres, rather than in-house based IT services, to power internet-based services such as Hotmail or Gmail. Data centre energy demand already accounts for 1.5% to 2% of world electricity consumption and is set to quadruple over the next 10 years.

Molly Webb, head of smart technology at the Climate Group in London, said: “Greenpeace is calling for transparency from companies which rely heavily on data centres, and that would ideally highlight the need for investment and ambitious government policy to ensure enough clean power is available to green our tweets.”

Jonathan Koomey, a project scientist for the End-Use Forecasting Group at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, whose work was cited in the study, said that the IT industry wrongly attracted criticism: “The use of IT often reduces environmental impacts. When we compared greenhouse gas emissions for downloading music to buying it on a CD, for example, we found downloads reduced emissions 40-80%.”

Apple declined to comment on the Greenpeace report. But at its last shareholder meeting, Apple CFO Peter Oppenheimer said the company would have more to say on the new data centre in Maiden, North Carolina, in the spring.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010

Published via the Guardian News Feed plugin for WordPress.

Posted in News | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Arsenal face suffocating assault from a Barcelona provoked by defiance

Powered by Guardian.co.ukThis article titled “Arsenal face suffocating assault from a Barcelona provoked by defiance” was written by Paul Hayward, for The Guardian on Monday 7th March 2011 18.25 UTC

All the striving, all the high ideals, have come to this: a test of exquisite complexity in a place where even the grandest dreamers can be destroyed. A test of everything Arsenal want to be.

When Andrey Arshavin scooted across north-London turf to give Arsène Wenger’s team a 2-1 lead in their Champions League duet with Barcelona, he twisted all normal thinking. Arsenal parade a pioneering spirit but in this rematch they are required to hold what they have. Instead of elaboration all the talk is of elaborate strategies.

This is not the modern Arsenal way. When these two versions of a single idea reconvene in the Camp Nou the English representatives will be bounced into a game of fight or flight, attack and retreat, in which the capacity to make the correct tactical decisions in an inferno of psychological pressure will matter as much as stylish passing. Any player who thrives under such duress need never doubt himself.

The London game vindicated Wenger’s faith not in kaleidoscopic movement so much as vengeful counterattacking: a policy that will be much harder to go with in the probable absence of Robin van Persie, their best finisher, and Theo Walcott, the team’s quickest and most direct runner. Nor is the rushing back of Cesc Fábregas from injury conducive to a smooth application of Arsenal’s biggest strengths.

First time round a break-out strategy rescued the good from the even better. It halted Barça’s ball-hogging and sent Arsenal’s supporters into the night exultant. Their heroes recovered from 1-0 down at the interval by invading the space behind Barcelona’s defenders, who press high up the pitch and assume the victim will be too dumbstruck or slow to exploit the unmanned space.

Can this work again in a stadium where Barcelona have won 18 of their 21 home fixtures and where Lionel Messi scored four against the Gunners last year as retaliation for Nicklas Bendtner’s impertinent early goal? Arshavin’s raid three weeks ago worked as an epiphany but also as a provocation. It was the instance of defiance that guaranteed Barcelona would be at their most eager and inventive when the clubs met again to settle the argument.

The twisting of mental ropes is therefore more audible in the Arsenal camp than that of Barcelona, who will feel sure they can progress if they convert the kind of chances they squandered at the Emirates or if they simply replicate their best league form. Then a 1-0 win would suffice, on the away goals rule. Arsenal on the other hand must bend their own identity and switch between attacking and defensive modes as circumstances require.

To inflict death by endless passing is Wenger’s creed but there is no scope for it in Catalonia, except when Arsenal recover the ball and attempt to strike back hard and fast. “We will have to play another way, because it’s one of the few games where we will spend 60% of the time defending,” Wenger says.

Haunting their supporters is the memory of a recent opportunity thrown away. The Carling Cup final was lost when Wojciech Szczesny (goalkeeper) and Laurent Koscielny (centre-back) contrived a penalty box farce which Birmingham City exploited to extend Wenger’s six-year wait for a trophy. “We have to fight against the pre-conceived ideas, because the only way of thinking is that Arsenal cannot defend,” Wenger protests. “I will just remind you that in the last 11 games we have seven clean sheets in the Premier League. We have conceded less goals than Man United, who have a very good defence. We can defend when we have to. We prefer to attack, that is for sure.”

The suffocating intensity of this tie is Arsenal’s punishment for losing at Shakhtar Donetsk and SC Braga in the group phase. A second-place finish might have pitted them against Real Madrid, Bayern Munich or Schalke. But the entertainment deities decreed they should face a superior version of themselves. All neutrals should give thanks for that.

Their overall record against Barcelona was inauspicious until last month’s win broke a sequence of five encounters without a victory, yet there are spots of light. Arsenal were 2-0 down at home in last year’s first leg but recovered to draw 2-2. This time they trailed to a David Villa goal before Van Persie and Arshavin flipped the plot. Only the 4-1 defeat at Camp Nou last April really hurts: “the Lionel Messi show”, as Wenger remembers it now.

This is Arsenal’s 13th Champions League campaign and the 11th consecutive time they have advanced beyond the group stage. Barcelona were insurmountable in the 2006 final as well but at least last month’s win demonstrates the absence of an inferiority complex on Arsenal’s part. Still elusive, though, is an explanation for their ability to lead 4-0 at Newcastle and draw 4-4, donate a goal at the end of a Carling Cup final but display no trace of fatalism while one-down to Barcelona, their nemesis.

“I know this team will become stronger and stronger,” Wenger said again the other day. This is his theory of endless self-improvement, repeated endlessly. The trouble is: this is not a game solely of conundrums and tactics. Beyond plans and schemes an immense array of individual talent confronts Arsenal in Spain. They face not only an artistic manifesto but a mass of threats in single form. It could get Messi.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010

Published via the Guardian News Feed plugin for WordPress.

Posted in News, Sports | Leave a comment

Thomas Edison’s genius celebrated in Google doodle … but spot the error

Powered by Guardian.co.ukThis article titled “Thomas Edison’s genius celebrated in Google doodle … but spot the error” was written by Alok Jha, for theguardian.com on Friday 11th February 2011 13.03 UTC

Today’s Google doodle of Thomas Edison reminded me of a “well-I-never!” fact that could come in useful if it crops up at a pub quiz. Who invented the light bulb? It was Edison, right? That’s the standard answer (admit it, that’s what you thought). But it’s not correct.

The Wizard of Menlo Park was certainly one of the most productive and creative inventors in history. His entry on Wikipedia says that he had more than a thousand patents to his name in the US, UK, Germany and France and is “credited with numerous inventions that contributed to mass communication and, in particular, telecommunications. These included a stock ticker, a mechanical vote recorder, a battery for an electric car, electrical power, recorded music and motion pictures. His advanced work in these fields was an outgrowth of his early career as a telegraph operator.”

Edison was busy doing all his prolific inventing when he came across the work of the English scientist and inventor Joseph Swan. In the 1840s, Swan had started experimenting with heating things up until they glowed, thinking this might be a reliable way to produce light for illumination. It took decades of work before he finally got his patent for a carbon filament incandescent lamp, which worked by heating up the carbon until it was white hot. The glowing filament did not catch fire because it was enclosed in a partial vacuum and there wasn’t enough oxygen to allow ignition.

Swan demonstrated his electric light bulb in 1879, but it wasn’t very efficient. Enter Thomas Alva Edison’s marketing machine.

Edison had been working on copies of Swan’s bulb, trying to improve its efficiency. He patented an electric light bulb (a copy of Swan’s design) in America and began marketing and selling and getting the product into offices and homes. Swan may have invented the light bulb, but Edison can rightly lay claim to making it popular.

Subsequently – and here’s where the historical error starts – Edison began telling people that he was the inventor of the light bulb. Swan did not seem too concerned, however, and just agreed to keep the rights to the invention in Britain, while Edison kept the American market.

The two eventually merged their businesses into the Edison and Swan United Company. So everyone was happy, though history got slightly rewritten in the confusion. Perhaps it’s time Google dedicated a doodle to Joseph Swan.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010

Published via the Guardian News Feed plugin for WordPress.

Posted in News | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment