Quotes Part One

The Philosophical aspect of every individual and what they do centers around a known knowledge, which can either be logical or illogical depending on what perspective it’s being looked upon. To go to an extent to explain a rational of someone’s state of mind begins from a point of understanding, which is a basic necessity to fully comprehend one’s inner judgement of how they view thing around them. These quotes depict the daily aspect of an Author : Prince  and how he view things around him learning from a different perspective of encounters and experiences researched. These quote does not reflect the author’s state of mind but rather a rational developed to gain insight to a new form of Philosophy that the author feels every person should adopt or try to adopt depending on the situation presented before them.

Quote 1: when you linger around fools, they tend to sway you into their own level .

Quote 2: Being smart means you should account for every step taken in a rational manner.

Quote 3: some women  like to be controlled not in an autocratic way but in a divine way.

Quote 4:  we are limited by the way we react to situations around us. Sometimes we just have to push our limits in any circumstances to get better results.

Quote 5: When there’s no order there’s chaos but where there is tranquility there is order.

Quote 6 : The way you see things can not be the way another person would see it. Try to comprehend every event you encounter.

Quote  7: Being Loved doesn’t mean that you owe anything to someone, having trust makes being loved worth while.

Quote 8: if we don’t have principles which governs our lives then our life becomes as tainted as charcoal because principles  are what governs rules that keeps us from destruction.

Quote 9: Being smart means you should anticipate every other persons ideas and move before they make it.

Quote 10: if you’re smart enough then you shouldn’t be talking with people who can’t comprehend your level of knowledge because if you do, it just as though you’ve be lowered to a primitive state.

Quote Bonus : it’s good to have a tactical reasoning ability, what this means is that all corners are checked before an action is done.

Quote 11: The problem with people is that they ask too much and do too little. Never listen to a man who doesn’t value his time, he will only bring you down.

Quote 12: words shouldn’t judge a person, instead a person’s entirety should be judge based on the noble action he or she does.

Quote 13: The truth about people is the fact sometimes they can wish for your failure when in reality they can’t explain why they feel that way. That’s how rivalry begins between people. They could be friends or not.

Quote 14: in times of worry, people become confused and can be intoxicated with unjust behavior.

Quote 15: in anger never raise your thoughts into something you Shouldn’t do, because at the end you can end up loosing sight of what’s important.

Quote 16: The true nature of people always show in times of trouble and distress. That’s when you can always know who’s your friend or enemy.

Quote  17: who ever said a rich man should always help is wrong, the rich doesn’t owe the world anything to help. Helping comes from the heart and it’s a sole desire to see someone in anguish and do something about it.

Quote 18: the circle of life doesn’t revolve around a particular group of people, individuals who think that they are superior to others should start thinking that one day everything owned is lost.

Quote  19: life is not just a journey is a voyage to discover the true purpose why you were given a gift that many ask for.

Quote 20: when in doubt always wait for the right decision to flow through your thoughts and never jump into conclusion. How will you know which decision is right is up to you to follow what is right from wrong.

Posted in Life, Social, Society | Leave a comment

How to get Away with Murder

I have been seeing this series on Netflix for the Past one year and never came to my mind to watch it. However i decided to take a leap of faith since there were apparently no other series that was in my interest at the time being. Hence I had to watch this series, at first it didn’t occur to me that it would be an interesting story line filled with plots and drama but then again isn’t it why we watch series.

How to get away with Murder

HOW TO GET AWAY WITH MURDER –

Basically, its all about a Lawyer named Annalise Keating who is a Professor at Middleton University that handles weird and murder cases which results in her winning most of the time. The plot of the story is quite interesting, because she appointed 5 student who actually helps her do her Job. I still wonder if Wes and the other student actually get paid for helping her solve her law cases?.

The whole stories so far as i have watched just Season 1, centers around the Murder of a Young University Girl which involved her husband Sam. whom was later murder by her student then later she tried to cover it as she hated the fact her husband was sleeping with the girl that was murdered. It’s quite a Mouth full I know but its also interesting to see how it plays out.

Its a nice series which comes with a different plot, although the amount of sexual scene makes it a little bit awkward even there was a scene where it’s supposed to be sexual and yet again they were showing the corpse of the Dead University Girl as her body was been examined. Those two scenes were just way not cool didn’t help that episode at all. In all, give it a shot, i think you will come to like it.

 

Posted in Series | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Suicide Squad – Movie Review

Suicide Squad

Suicide Squad

I have to say that this movie is not totally what i expected but then again, it has a nice scene to it. Will Smith playing Deadshot, was just awesome. Somehow I feel the entire movie was just based on Deadshot. Never-the-less the movie showcase a lot of villains, whom are deemed to be “Bad Ass“. The most iconic thing i enjoyed while watching this movie, is the fact they were able to include Batman (Ben Affleck) as a Cameo. which i just loved.

Suicide Squad depicts a team of bad guys as they are called, who are actually recruited by a Secret Government Organization handled by Amanda Waller (Viola Davis). Now Amanda is not a typical person you should Joke with. There is a scene where the Team went to rescue her and eventually she has to kill her own agents because they are not cleared to actually view the secret that she’s engaged in.

This shows you a different side of her and apparently she is not someone to play it. However, the entire movie i believe is centered around Deadshot, now Deadshot is not a typical criminal, he’s more like an Assassin that never misses. just think of him as the Hawkeye in DC Universe. If this movie should have a star rating, i would give it a “4”, its not a really loved movie, however its an enjoyable movie, it shows you how a band of individual with uncommon interest can actually come together especially when their lives depend on it to do something Good.

Besides all the killing that they had to do based on how Enchantress (Cara Delevingne) changed every human they came in contact in the train station. I think the destruction level compared to Man of Steel, is less even lesser than Batman V Superman.

In all, its a nice movie to go and watch with friends and family, not recommended for kids though due to the violence portrayed. So watch it, some reviews i read online, claims that the movie is a flop, well its good i don’t listen to so many reviews and actually do  mine. In comparison, The Joker Character here is way off but something new and something i think they can develop to become even better than the Christopher Nolan Joker.

 

Posted in Movies | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

It’s time for Jane Bond: I spy seven potential 007 actors perfect for the role

 

Powered by Guardian.co.ukThis article titled “It’s time for Jane Bond: I spy 007 actors perfect for the role” was written by Ben Child, for theguardian.com on Tuesday 31st May 2016 18.35 UTC

If you think the chances of the next James Bond being female are up there with the disappointingly long odds on Captain America starting to date men, here’s a polite history lesson. If it hadn’t been for 2002’s Die Another Day firing blanks with the critics, a suave female super spy operating in the same film universe as 007 might already have sipped down her first minimally mixed martini.

Studio MGM once planned to give Halle Berry’s Giacinta “Jinx” Johnson her own spin-off following the NSA agent’s appearance alongside Pierce Brosnan in Lee Tamahori’s disastrous turn at the Bond helm. Naturally, the idea was swiftly dropped down an industrial chimney after the 20th 007 adventure, with its invisible CGI cars and dumb ice palace lairs, was ruthlessly torn to pieces by the merciless sharks otherwise known as the world’s critics.

Prior to Berry, production company Eon even considered giving Tomorrow Never Dies’ Michelle Yeoh her own movie as Chinese spy Wai Lin. So why shouldn’t Gillian Anderson, and now Game of Thrones’ Emilia Clarke, tout themselves for the role of “Jane Bond”? Here are seven actors who would make a heavenly female 007.

Rosamund Pike

Rosamund Pike
Rosamund Pike’s previous turn as a Bond girl need not hold her back. Photograph: David Fisher/Rex

Hang on a minute, Pike played turncoat MI6 agent Miranda Frost in Die Another Day, I hear you cry. But plenty of 007 stalwarts, from Charles Gray to Maud Adams, have appeared in different roles in more than one Bond movie. Pike has the steely countenance, cut-glass Brit accent and spiky sex appeal (as seen in the excellent Gone Girl) to play the suave British agent, and at the age of 37 has the perfect blend of youthfulness and maturity. She’s even played Pussy Galore for a BBC radio production of Goldfinger, and has narrated audio versions of several Bond books. Now at the peak of her career following an Oscar nod for Gone Girl, the role of the new 007 would surely be Pike’s already had she only been born a fella.

Jane Bond rating: 009

Emilia Clarke

Game of Thrones and Terminator: Genisys star Emilia Clarke has touted herself to play ‘Jane Bond’
Game of Thrones and Terminator: Genisys star Emilia Clarke has touted herself to play ‘Jane Bond’. Photograph: Melinda Sue Gordon/AP

She may be of diminutive stature, but assorted swarthy slavemasters, frazzled Dothraki and treacherous maegi could tell you that the 29-year-old star of Game of Thrones is to be messed with at your peril. Still, Clarke barely registered as the new Sarah Connor in sci-fi sequel Terminator: Genisys (a fault, perhaps of the film-makers rather than the actor) last year, and is clearly yet to prove herself on the big screen. She wants it, though.

Jane Bond rating: 006

Gillian Anderson

Gillian Anderson as Dana Scully on the X-Files.
Gillian Anderson as Dana Scully on the X-Files. Photograph: Fox via Getty Images

Anderson is officially bidialectal, meaning that she can pull off perfect English and American accents (a legacy of her mixed roots), which ought surely to make her a shoo-in for MI6 recruitment. Best known for the X-Files movies and television series, the Chicago-born actor was excellent in a supporting role as a hard-nosed Brit agent in the 2012 James Marsh Troubles drama Shadow Dancer, led by one-time Bond candidate Clive Owen. She’s quite capable of pulling off the cruel-eyed menace combined with dazzling charisma that undercuts the very best Bonds, and keen on the role.

Jane Bond rating: 008

Olivia Colman

Olivia Colman in The Night Manager
Olivia Colman has won huge praise for her turn as a spy boss in The Night Manager. Photograph: Des Willie/BBC/The Ink Factory/Des Willie

Her turn as a no-nonsense working-class spook in the BBC’s The Night Manager might suggest Colman belongs in the gloomier John le Carré carriage of the spy drama express train, rather than Ian Fleming’s more glamorous luxury cabin suite. But the Norwich-born actor also has a powerful background in comedy thanks to long-running stints in cult British TV sitcoms such as Peep Show, and could help return the long-running spy saga to light-hearted territory. Might she make an even better Q?

Jane Bond rating: 007

Kate Winslet

Kate Winslet
Kate Winslet would be a rare, Oscar-winning Bond. Photograph: Ethan Miller/Getty Images

Now we’re talking. If Winslet can be persuaded to slum it as a dystopian baddie in the Divergent movies, she could hardly turn down the chance to play the first-ever female Bond. The 40-year-old star of Titanic and Steve Jobs has a suitably chameleonic range, as typified by her Oscar-winning turn as a former Nazi prison guard in The Reader, and has topped recent UK polls of actors the public would like to see play 007. She’s never led an action franchise, but what a signing it would be.

Jane Bond rating: 009

Felicity Jones

Felicity Jones in Rogue One: A Star Wars Story.
Felicity Jones in Rogue One: A Star Wars Story. Photograph: YouTube

About to prove her all-action chops as female Han Solo type Jynn Erso in the new Star Wars (don’t call it a) prequel Rogue One, though there are worrying reports that Gareth Edwards’ movie has run into trouble six months ahead of its December release. Still, Jones picked up an Oscar nod for best actress following her beautifully understated turn as Stephen Hawking’s wife Jane in The Theory of Everything, so she ought to have few problems throwing bad guys and enemy agents off train carriages.

Jane Bond rating: 006

Emily Blunt

Emily Blunt in Edge of Tomorrow.
Emily Blunt in Edge of Tomorrow. Photograph: Courtesy of Warner Bros. Enterta/Publicity image from film company

If the perfect candidate ought to combine posh sex appeal and the ability to beat grown men to a pulp, Blunt is the Aston Martin DB5 of Jane Bond hopefuls. More than capable of handling action, comedy and serious drama with all the verve and panache one might expect from Her Majesty’s top agent, the chance to replace Daniel Craig would surely represent just the latest challenge for an actor who has taken Hollywood by storm in recent years. When compared to Blunt’s bad-ass turn as Rita Vrataski, in sci-fi action spectacular Edge of Tomorrow, Hollywood’s top action star, Tom Cruise, exhibited all the screen menace of Nick Nack from The Man With the Golden Gun. And all this from the woman who once played Miss Piggy’s PA.

Jane Bond rating: 009

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010

Published via the Guardian News Feed plugin for WordPress.

Posted in News | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Cincinnati zoo: every mother knows it could happen to her

Powered by Guardian.co.ukThis article titled “Cincinnati zoo: every mother knows it could happen to her” was written by Ijeoma Oluo, for theguardian.com on Tuesday 31st May 2016 20.26 UTC

Following the death of a gorilla in a Cincinnati zoo – shot after a four-year-old entered its enclosure – there has been a large outcry from many wondering why the mother of the boy was not being held responsible for the entire situation. After all, if she’d been doing her job as a mother, there’s no way this would have happened, right?

If you believe that, you either don’t know anything about raising small children, or you’ve been blessed with unnaturally docile kids.

I clearly remember running out to my mailbox for 20 seconds while my 18-month-old was watching Little Einsteins, only to find that he had dashed up and locked the door behind me. No amount of pleading would get him to unlock the door. My keys and cell phone were inside with him.

He was left alone with every light socket, every cleaning agent, every climbable bookcase – everything that we are constantly grabbing from our child’s hands at the last minute – for a full 20 minutes before I was able to get a maintenance man to let me into my apartment. That he was simply sitting on the floor playing with his toys when I reentered the apartment is a small miracle.

I remember how quickly my sons could dash away from me and into a busy street after a suddenly dropped ball, missing incoming cars by mere inches as I wildly grabbed for them and flung them out of the path of death.

I remember these moments and many more so clearly because I, like many mothers, have replayed them over and over in my head, unable to stop the movie of worst case scenarios that could have been from torturing me. Unable to stop berating myself over how close my failures as a mother had come to costing me the most precious beings in my life.

I shared these moments and more on Facebook on Monday night, in the face of the brutal public shaming of the mother of the 4-year-old boy who had managed to find the one child-sized entryway into the gorilla enclosure. I knew I was not alone.

Soon, I had dozens of responses from other parents, sharing their close calls. A mother whose small child had grabbed a stool and climbed out a second-story window. A handful of stories of children who had momentarily disappeared from their parents in malls and grocery stores. Near drownings, poisonings and stabbings. Broken bones, stitches and concussions – all on a loving parent’s watch. The stories poured out of parents, mostly mothers, with a sense of relief – they were finally able to say the thing that we never admit in public.

No amount of good parenting can guarantee our kids’ safety.

It is a terrifying thing to admit, but it’s true. Small children have a death wish. They have an innate sense of curiosity matched with the inability to comprehend danger. Add to that small size, surprisingly quick movement, and a creativity forgotten in adulthood, and you have a recipe for never-ending possible disaster.

For all of human history, it has been a gamble as to whether we could keep our precious offspring alive. So much is completely out of our control. Illness, the elements, war, famine – it’s bad enough when you don’t add in things like jumping off staircases, running into traffic, or trying to make household objects into working parachutes.

The mortality of our children is an unbearable reality, so when the worst does happen, to admit that it could be so random and uncontrollable is unacceptable. We are people, dammit, we are in control. Someone must be to blame otherwise it means that none of us are safe.

And, predictably, we blame mothers. The pressure on mothers to be ever vigilant, never tired, never unhappy, never overwhelmed and never distracted is an impossible and dangerous expectation. The idea that we should be able to “manage” our children, as if they are reasonable adults and not semi-feral animals covered in germs and fueled by destruction, is laughable. But we perpetrate these myths, and whenever the truth becomes unavoidable, we shame the mother instead of looking at the situation honestly.

This shame does nothing more than torture mothers with the knowledge that, according to society, they are bad mothers. It prevents them from asking for help and from having the sort of conversations about the dangerous situations our children find themselves in that could indeed make our children safer.

If you have a child, you know that feeling of panic when in a split second your precious baby had endangered themselves. If you don’t have children, know that you were the source of that same panic to your parents multiple times. Imagine the horror movie likely running through in constant loop of the mind of the mother of that 4 year old boy – of what did happen and the even worse horrors that could have been. And show a little empathy.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010

Published via the Guardian News Feed plugin for WordPress.

Posted in News | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Do-Over review – Adam Sandler misfires in identity-theft yukfest

 

Powered by Guardian.co.ukThis article titled “The Do-Over review – Adam Sandler misfires in identity-theft yukfest” was written by Jordan Hoffman, for theguardian.com on Tuesday 31st May 2016 21.24 UTC

With his second direct-to-Netflix endeavor, The Do-Over, Adam Sandler has found a way to warp time. No, the story does not offer useful guidelines on how one can revert to one’s youth, as the title suggests, but creates a set and setting in which time magically moves at a fraction of the normal rate. Surely this movie must be almost over, you think, as you jab the pause button on your remote – only to find you are at the 50-minute mark with another 58 to go. It’s a remarkable feat, as so little else in this picture has anything noteworthy happening at all.

It starts out simple, but moderately amusing. Charlie McMillan (David Spade) is a milquetoast loser who bumps into his old, cooler friend Max Kessler (Sandler) at a high school reunion. McMillan wears the same nerdy clothes and drives the same awful car and even holds the same humiliating job he did in high school: working in a bank inside a supermarket. (Old ladies ask him where they can find kitty litter. After explaining, again, that the bank is independent from the market, he sighs, reduced to his fate: aisle two.)

McMillan is stuck in a rut. His faithless wife is still shacking up with her ex, but McMillan is raising their bratty twin sons. Kessler, a slightly toned down version of Sandler’s hard-partying jerk persona as seen in That’s My Boy (a film some are brave enough to admit is not that bad), convinces McMillan to come hang out on his yacht one weekend. (Kessler works for the FBI, so he’s got a boat. Why not?)

After introducing a Bud Light Party Ball (“Put your ear next to it and you can still hear someone puking at a Def Leppard concert!”) the pair unwind. A musical montage of fun includes shouting “Show us your tits!” to a neighboring boat of (in the parlance of the film) “hotties” who comply, then respond: “Show us your dick!” The ladies take one look at what McMillan is packing and shout “Boo!” so Kessler fires a flare at them, forcing them to dive overboard.

This is, depending on your point of view, even-handed good-natured ribbing or gross male hostility. Whatever your decision, know this: it comes during the “good” plot-light and schtick-heavy part of the movie. (Unlike director Steven Brill’s last picture, the quite spry Blake Edwards-ish Elizabeth Banks vehicle Walk of Shame, The Do-Over becomes completely unraveled once things get complicated.)

Kessler has a plan, you see. He blows up the boat, enabling the two to fake their own death. Won’t authorities look for bodies? They will but, as it turns out, Kessler doesn’t work for the FBI – he is a coroner, and had access to two age-appropriate corpses that no one will miss. Kessler and McMillan can assume their identities and start a new life.

Kessler maxed out his credit cards and has enough dough for them to float for a while, but there was also a safety deposit box in the rectum of one of the two men, you see. This leads to an enormous cache of cash and the keys to a mansion in Puerto Rico. “There’s like five houses in this house!” McMillan (now called Dr Fishman) shouts with glee.

On permanent vacation (“Play Who Let The Dogs Out!”, McMillan drunkenly suggests at a resort bar) there’s dancing and hookups, one of which involves a bit of homosexual panic when sweat from Luis Guzmán’s scrotum drips all over David Spade’s glasses. The gay jokes (and there are many) come encased in layers of “not that there’s anything wrong with it!” disclaimers, but one has to wonder why this is such a recurring theme. Another source for yuks: libidinal geriatric Renée Taylor, whose topless scene will similarly land as either cruel or “all in good fun” depending on where your personal line is drawn.

The frivolity comes to an end, though when an acrobatic German hitman comes calling. I mean, they are living in luxury in the Caribbean, clearly the men whose lives our heroes stole are involved in either drugs or weapons, so the second half of the movie becomes a would-be Statham-like actioner. The plot, which now involves the real Dr Fishman’s widow (Paula Patton), is convoluted, but it’s not worth worrying too much about. It’s not like they’re curing cancer.

Oh, but they are! In a second-act reveal it’s discovered that our two doofuses have stumbled into an enormous corporate conspiracy to repress a miracle cancer drug. No amount of shouting “do over!” at the screen can turn the plot around, as it suddenly becomes a quasi-serious thriller to save mankind. With Sandler and Spade. On a direct-to-Netflix budget.

Despite an idiocy metastasized into the marrow of its script impervious to any radiation, there is, as with many of Sandler’s productions, at least something of an upbeat quality to its reprehensibility. While scoping out his own funeral he sees an Asian man. “My dry cleaner showed up?” It’s a creaky, racist joke, but then there’s the follow-through. “I didn’t see that one coming,” he mumbles. And then, brightly, “I love that guy!” This movie is nothing if not begging for you to reconsider it.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010

Published via the Guardian News Feed plugin for WordPress.

Posted in Entertainment, News | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

No sanctions or calls for Justin Trudeau to apologize again for ‘elbowgate’

 

Powered by Guardian.co.ukThis article titled “No sanctions or calls for Justin Trudeau to apologize again for ‘elbowgate'” was written by Ashifa Kassam in Toronto, for theguardian.com on Tuesday 31st May 2016 22.20 UTC

Justin Trudeau, Canada’s prime minister, will not face sanctions or be forced to apologize again over accusations that he manhandled one member of parliament and elbowed another, a parliamentary committee decided on Tuesday.

The country’s normally staid House of Commons erupted into chaos earlier this month after a visibly annoyed Trudeau strode into a group of MPs, grabbed Conservative Gord Brown by the arm and led him out of the group.

Parliamentarians had been waiting to vote on a controversial motion put forward by Trudeau’s Liberals that sought to limit debate on their assisted suicide legislation. The vote was delayed as several New Democrat MPs gathered around Brown, seemingly impeding him from taking his place.

Trudeau reportedly swore as he strode toward Brown, telling MPs to “get the fuck out of the way”. Video of the tussle showed Trudeau inadvertently elbowing New Democrat Ruth Ellen Brosseau as he pulled Brown away from the group.

Mayhem ensued. MPs shouted and pounded their desks as Tom Mulcair, leader of the New Democratic party, lashed out at Trudeau. “What kind of man elbows a woman? It’s pathetic! You’re pathetic!” Mulcair shouted.

Trudeau apologized three times for sparking the heated melee, including one apology directed at Brosseau. “I want to take the opportunity … to be able to express directly to [Brosseau] my apologies for my behaviour and my actions, unreservedly,” he said.

The incident dominated Canadian news coverage for days and sent #Elbowgate trending on Twitter. Brosseau was left fending off personal attacks, including accusations that she was “crying wolf”. Parliamentarians spent hours debating the kerfuffle as Canadians wondered how much to make of an unprecedented physical fracas involving the prime minister.

The incident was referred to an all-party committee for review, after the speaker of the House of Commons, Liberal Geoff Regan, concluded that Brosseau’s privileges as an MP had been breached.

On Tuesday, the Liberal-dominated House of Commons Procedure and House Affairs committee gathered for the first time since the incident. Possible sanctions over the incident could have seen Trudeau suspended or forced to apologize for the fourth time.

NDP member David Christopherson shared a statement from Brosseau, who is currently in China on a parliamentary trade mission.

Brosseau said she had accepted Trudeau’s apology but noted that the incident would not be tolerated in any workplace. “It left many members stunned and raised important questions about the conduct of the prime minister in a House that was already confronted with unprecedented government measures to limit debate.”

She asked the committee to drop the issue. “It is my sincere hope that all members will work to ensure that we never see this conduct repeated, and also that we take this opportunity to recommit to improving the tone of debate in parliament.”

Members of the committee wasted little time in turning the page on Elbowgate: Tuesday’s review of the incident took just 15 minutes, after which members unanimously passed a motion to drop the issue.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010

Published via the Guardian News Feed plugin for WordPress.

Posted in News | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment